Surprise: Warner admits iTunes sales slow on price hikes

|
Share

Warner Music revealed its financial results today - admitting more expensive tracks just didn’t sell as quickly. As we know, iTunes now lets labels charge more per track, if they so choose.

The effect? Warner admits digital revenue growth in the last quarter of 8 percent compared to 20 percent in the previous year's corresponding quarter.

“This is in line with an industry-wide slowdown in which year-over-year “digital track equivalent album unit growth” dropped to 5 percent in the December quarter, after being at 10 percent in the September quarter and 11 percent in the June quarter,” we’re told by the Silicon Valley Business Journal.

This, according to the Byzantine logic of Big Music, equates to a “net positive” for Warner. So - selling fewer tracks by artists to fewer people is a success, so long as the profit per tune ranks high.

Warner CEO Edgar Bronfman Jr. - who called this a “net positive” - predicted subscription services could eventually become more important than iTunes type sales.

“The number of potential subscribers dwarves the number of people purchasing music on iTunes," he said.

In the subscription model, of course, people pay a few cents for each track they have access too.

Comments (9)

So, even though Apple warned them of lower sales they went ahead with their sales strategy of charging more per track and the sales went down. Now they are thinking their next idea will, that Apple yet again doesn't think is viable, will "dwarf" iTunes style sales? When will the recoding industry learn that their old school business model does not and will not apply to digital distribution? I guess never.

This makes perfect sense....why sell a million songs for $1 when you can sell 1 song for a million dollars!? its perfect! :)

Serves them right, maybe in the next reporting period they'll wise up and lower the prices. I for one, have not paid more then .99 per song and I won't.

This is going to hurt:

99¢ is worth less than it was back when the iTunes store opened in 2003.

Inflation has grown by roughly 18% between 2003 and 2010.

If iTune's pricing followed inflation, today's $1.29 tracks today would have been priced at roughly $1.06 back in 2003.

Ouch.

I don't believe in subscription model for music. It have no logic for me at all, but hey, is just my opinion

You know why Warner didn't sell as many songs? because they take all them off Youtube videos.

The higher the prices the less music sold.
The crappier the tunes the less music sold.
It ain't just the cost, peeps.

This is where market economy comes in.
If they want to sell more, they will lower the price.
Unfortunately they most likely don't want to sell more.

Music industry = greedy and confused. Most people myself included listen to music over and over thus we want to own it not rent it or worse yet subscribe to it... so if we switch services or in anyway decide to stop paying continually to hear our music we no longer have access to it.

Yet trapped in a mind set that is about greed music industry execs just don't get this.

Post new comment

Kept private and not shown publicly.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Allowed HTML tags: <a> <em> <strong> <cite> <code> <ul> <ol> <li> <dl> <dt> <dd>
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.

More information about formatting options